Showing posts with label curriculum design. Show all posts
Showing posts with label curriculum design. Show all posts

Friday, February 15, 2013

Reimagining "School" for all learners


I'm reading about a new way to think about "school", here are some of my takeaways: 

Key question:
If we don't "Teach" it to the students how will they know they learned it?  And how will we know?



  • Any change, such as this brings "excitement and momentum, mixed with discomfort and disequilibrium."
  • Moving away from classrooms that function in isolation, and toward collective intentionality and a team committed to thinking and learning collaboratively within a shared framework.
What does it mean to developing intentionality:
  • Type, condition and placement of furniture
  • Values, roles, organization of materials
  • Use of wall space
  • Way aesthetics invite learning
  • Ways we can share ownership
All furniture is evaluated based on condition, purpose and placement

Materials were questioned as to age and condition.  Looked at for potential for formal instruction and open-ended learning.

Careful selection of materials and placement of furniture supported creation of spaces within the classroom for:
  • Publishing areas with writing utensils, book making supplies
  • construction areas with block, moldings, ramps, pulleys, etc
  • mini-ateliers with wire, clay, paint, sewing
  • dramatic play areas full of costumes

Teachers and students work together to develop environments responding to interests, desires, expectations and possibilities.


Entryways to spaces are purposeful and reflect the students and teachers in the room.

Replacing of pre-made items with student generated materials.

Physical shifts are easy, conversations must be had to transition spaces from teacher-centered to child-centered, teaching to learning, every choice reflecting our values and our identity.

Shifts in time must also reflect these values:
  • Minimize large group lessons and replace them with small group, collaborative and individual work.
  • Differentiate for children
  • Create time and space to analyze the BIG questions
  • Balance formal instruction with inquiry
  • Reinforce collaboration
  • Develop strategies to encourage on-going projects
  • Analyze standards in borader more informed ways
  • Nurture interests and intrinsic motivation toward relevant meaningful work
Professional development must reflect these values.

Change is not always pervasive or linear.  Each teacher has the right to have space and encouragement to construct their own shift.


HOW we learn far outweighs WHAT we learn.

What we learn has to stretch far beyond memorization and google-able results.

A space where our learning Includes:
  • Critical thinking
  • Collaboration
  • Communication
  • Creativity
  • Research
  • Innovation

As children seek to answer their questions their autonomy, ownership, collaboration, and engagement increases.  Excitement momentum and accomplishment also grows.

Inquiry and projects are not separate from rigor or releveance but interwoven.

Challenge:  making this learning visible and making the process transparent

Does this sound amazing!?  


Exactly where I would want to work and what I want for every one of my students.  I think I work EXTREMELY HARD to make this space real for my students.  I teach middle school.  Did I mention that all the above descriptors were for a pre-school.  That makes it even more amazing.


Our school is investigating what is called the Reggio Emilia model for primary school students.  With all the latests and greatest research surrounding our earliest learners we are investigating what works best. (more research here: http://www.reaie.org.au/)

This investigation got me to thinking about the personalization we give every student in their learning.  Why can this model not only make for a great preschool, but for a great ANY school.

Here's an interview from a school right here in St. Louis: Maplewood

Background info:


Here's what we're reading: Article

Here's where we are going to visit: http://www.riverfield.org/

What if a High School modeled itself after this model?  What about a corporation?

Modern companies are working hard to make DESIGN be an essential part of the learning and collaboration of 21st century workplace.

Design with Intent: http://www.danlockton.com/dwi/Main_Page

Influence behavior through design: http://www.slideshare.net/makeramen/design-with-intent

Office Designs: http://www.hongkiat.com/blog/creative-modern-office-designs/

Collaborative Work spaces: http://design-milk.com/modern-coworking-weld-collaborative-work-studio-space/


Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Textbooks: They Just Don't Add Up

I'm going to be blunt: I hate textbooks.

I've been in my new position now for a couple months and I have heard so much discussion about textbooks that really frustrates me.  I'm working on how to have this conversation and here are my selling points:


First off, I read a Genius post by Tom Whitby @tomwhitby:
http://tomwhitby.wordpress.com/2012/03/20/we-dont-need-no-stinkn-textbooks-beyondthetextbook/

Second, I borrowed the technique of the math from Tony DiLaura @anthonydilaura


Now, here's some math I'm going to use to have conversations with my colleagues:

Buying 40 books per 4 teacher team:

$67/book x 160 books =
$10,720



So let's work with that budget:


What if teacher’s made the “book”?

4 teachers = $100/day (for subs) = $400/day


At $400/day we could take 4 teachers out of the classroom for 26.8 days and create a textbook of our own.


Can we make a better book in 26.8 days?

That's not ideal AT ALL, but at least it seems doable.

Now imagine if we "paid" teachers to do it outside of the work day.....


If we assumed $15-$20 per hour in the summer/after school time x 4 teachers/grade level for a total of $60-$80 per hour....

the $10,720 budget to pay teachers would mean we could have anywhere from 134 to 178 hours of work to pay (dare I say invest in) teachers to make their own book.

Can we do it better? Can we do a better job of keeping it updated? Allow it to be ours?

What if we "OPEN SOURCED" our learning?


Can you believe that video is from 2006!!!!!!!!!!!! And we are still having this conversation.


I mean let's be crazy:

What if we published it and sold it online? To schools and homeschool organizations?


I know I drank the "apple Kool-Aid," but
Let's be honest, they do it better...

There are many pieces of technology available to help us.  What if we purchased 4 Macbook Airs ($4000) and downloaded the iBooks Author Software (FREE) (Tony's How to) as well as the pages app ($40) that leaves us with over $6000 to pay teachers or subs to make our own book....

I just don't get it, let's just face it, purchasing textbooks just doesn't add up...

Saturday, October 6, 2012

Cornerstone Tasks


I've been working hard at Understanding the CCSS and it's implications for Curriculum development in my role as facilitator (coordinator).  People ask me questions everyday about how it will impact our curriculum.  

I've been saying in a nutshell it will cause us to rewrite and rethink.

Read my post on CCSS here then check this out:

Cornerstone tasks are opportunities for student to USE knowledge and skill they have learned throughout a unit or duration of study in order to INDEPENDENTLY demonstrate their learning.

These tasks are REALISTIC in nature.  Have an authentic audience (See Ron Berger, An Ethic of Excellence)

Cornerstone Tasks involve MANY:
  • CCSS
  • Content standards
  • 21st century skills (creativity, technology use, teamwork, etc.)
These cornerstone tasks "honor the intent of the standard within and across subject areas."

This SCREAMS Project, Problem, Passion and Game-based learning. 


See my post here on Curriculum Models throughout time....

Cornerstone tasks are designed to reoccur from grade-level to grade-level progressing from simpler to more sophisticated.  From more scaffolded to more autonomous in nature.

As we continue down the road of learning about the CCSS and begin looking at other standards, outcomes and expectations from areas such as NCSS, NCHE, NGSS, and others we MUST be so moved to revision items that impact our alignment:

1.  Our grading practices from points to standards based
2.  Our summative assessments from paper/pencil to something more authentic
3.  Out schedule from math only happens from 8:47 - 9:33 to when it's needed for the project
4.  Our role as educators from holder of knowledge to advocator of learning
5.  Our training of new teachers
6.  Our model of checklists and scope and sequences to Cornerstone Tasks

We will not be able to meet the myriad of tasks and performance outcomes simply by making a list and checking it off.  We MUST throw the goals and outcomes off the table, start fresh with these cornerstone tasks (project, problems, games, and passions) and pull in standards when and where they fit.


The CCSS will eventually cause us to change our thinking from:


Scope and sequence/step by step/1st hour, 2nd hour, 3rd hour


to this:

Theme/Project/Student-Centered/Passion-Driven/Cornerstone Task centered


Support and resources:



Images from:
Cornerstone - http://www.stonehouseconsulting.com/Benchmarking/Cornerstone_files/cornerstone-altered.jpg
Dominos - http://datejesus.com/falling_dominoes.jpg